Wednesday, November 27, 2019

buy custom The Healthcare Reform essay

buy custom The Healthcare Reform essay While the debate on health care reform ranges on, Democrats and Republicans are taking opposing sides. Democrats want a government-run health care while Republicans are for state-moderated health care policies. In between these two stances, we have one overdue reform that must be addressed if at all the founding American spirit is still alive. This singular reform requires no sides, no political will or economic back up. It only needs us to be human. Americans with pre-existing conditions, especially of terminal diseases like cancer, diabetes, Aids, heart complications etc, have been bared from accessing medical coverage in the last three decades (George, 2007). The few insurance covers available for them are so expensive that, when coupled with their ever-rising and perpetual medical bills accrued when managing the conditions, the covers are impractical and exploitative. The very citizens, whose love for the nation endures, the ones we walk alongside on the streets, are being denied medical cover just because they were unlucky enough to get terminal diseases. This are our fathers, mothers, brother, sisters, sons and daughters. It is time thatCongress revoked the spirit of individualism, the spirit of the dead burying their dead, and revives the very spirit of unity that was the foundation on which our nation took shape. America is defined by unity, by nationalism and by virtues of equality. Congress should, as urgently as yesterday, concur in ending the barriers that deny coverage to terminally sick Americans who are in need of medical assistance. This is not about costs of healthcare, it is not even about state control of a vibrant industry, it is not about doctors and health plans security, it is not about jobs and investments, it is about being human. A window surviving on a cent-worth salary to bring up her four children may never access medical coverage in her youthful life. However, when the children grow up, they may decide to reward her love and devotion with a medical cover, only that by that time she has already been diagnosed with cancer. Today, such a woman, a hero to the American economy, one who shares in the responsibility of building the nation, paying taxes and modeling the lives of American youths, is left by the sidelines because she was foolish enough not to get medical cover before developing cancerous cells. Is that Ameericanism? She represents a million and one patriots of this nation who cannot access medical cover because of preexisting conditions at the time when they can afford such a cover (George, 2007). Congress can formulate genius policies to correct this injustice and inhuman situation. For instance one such policy can be formulated as, The law shall deem any denial of medical cover to an interested party as discrimination. To cater for additional risks in covering persons with preexisting conditions, the premiums must not also be increased beyond those of persons without pre-existing conditions. It shall however be legal to reduce the amounts payable to claims made by persons with preexisting conditions. Teddy Roosevelt called for reforms because there was something innate in being American. Something brotherly, something borne of consciousness to do good, something that makes us the single greatest nation on earth. Almost all facets of US health care reform cannot wait, but this one must not wait. Abolishing the barriers that discriminate our sick loved ones from medical coverage is something American, irrespective of our Democrat or Republican orientation. Buy custom The Healthcare Reform essay

Saturday, November 23, 2019

MLA Referencing †Citing a YouTube Video

MLA Referencing – Citing a YouTube Video MLA Referencing – Citing a YouTube Video As Bob Dylan once sang, the times they are a-changin’. And while Bob was referring to the political climate in the 1960s, the statement applies equally to referencing sources in a college paper. These days, for example, you can cite YouTube videos in your work alongside books and journal articles. Were sure Bob would have sang about it if YouTube had been a thing in the 60s, though. But how do you do this exactly? In this post, we’ll look at how to cite YouTube and other online videos using the MLA referencing system, including both in-text citations and the list entry. In-Text Citations for a YouTube Video In MLA referencing, you cite print sources by giving the author’s surname and a page number. This isn’t possible when citing a video, though, as there are no page numbers to cite! What you do have is a time code or timestamp. This is the point in the video you want to cite, usually given in hours, minutes, and seconds. For example, we could cite a YouTube video like this: Defamiliarization is a key aspect of literature (Rugnetta 00:07:40). In this case, we’re citing a moment 7 minutes and 40 seconds into a video by Mike Rugnetta. Sometimes, though, it might not be easy to tell who to cite as the creator. In this case, for instance, we’ve used the presenter of the video, but in others you may want to cite a director or producer. The important thing is to use the same name in citations as you do in the list. The basic format for a YouTube video in an MLA list is: Author Surname, First Name. â€Å"Title of Video.† Platform/Website, uploaded by Username/Organization, date of upload, URL. In practice, then, the video we cited above would be referenced like this: Rugnetta, Mike. â€Å"BUT WAIT: Is Bob Dylan’s Work Really Literature?† YouTube, uploaded by PBS Idea Channel, November 2 2016, www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF7m44ORlRM. As shown above, you do not need to include the â€Å"http://† bit of the URL here. Missing Source Information You may sometimes find it difficult to find information for an online video source. If this occurs, simply include as much detail as possible so that the reader can identify the video based on your list. If you cannot find a name of the author of a video, for example, you can use the uploader’s name instead. As long as you also provide a valid URL in the full reference, this should be enough for the reader to find the video cited.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Technopoly Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Technopoly - Essay Example Postman talks about the fact that how the society has transformed. He argues that the society’s culture seems more like a tool using culture in present scenario and it is losing the natural elements that were present in the culture before. His constant arguments about technology made people to consider him as the Critics of Technology. The book ‘Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology’ states Postman arguments, ideas and thoughts about the new culture being adopted by the society of which he was highly against. He argues that United States is the only country to have developed into Technopoly. He believes that Technology is not a friend; it is not constructive but destructive to the society. He is of the opinion that the dark side to the invention and adoption of technology by the society is that the culture without moral foundation was evolving. Technology is considered as both friend and enemy. This book reveals that how gradually technology has become a threat and enemy to the society. The book is comprised of eleven chapters. Each chapter talks about the element technology from a different perspective, Chapter number one, ‘The Judgment of Thamus’ points to Phaedrus where Socrates tells him a story about Thamus who was a King in the city of Egypt. Postman believed that the story is a total paradox of technology in today’s age. He explains that the story involves the issue of a person who is doubtfulabout the innovation of writing and how people will become less intellectual because of their lack of reliance on their minds. He defends his reason of incorporating the story of Thamus in the start of the essay, He defends his argument by saying â€Å"I begin my book with this legend because in Thamus ‘response there are several sound principles from which we may begin to learn how to think† (Postman, 1993,